This case has stirred the Australian press for almost a month now. I posted this piece about it some two weeks ago. It’s the case of the Australian woman who moved to Italy to study the language, met an Italian man, married him and had four daughters with him. They separated with her getting primary custody and him getting fairly sparse visitation. Two years ago, she took the girls to Australia for what she said was a holiday, never to return. He’s been going through various court procedures to try to get his kids back and earlier this year, prevailed. An Australian court found that the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction required the girls’ return to Italy. The mother had claimed that the father was abusive, but the Australian judge found no evidence of that.
What’s been most remarkable about the case is the press coverage it’s received in Australia. In my first piece on it, I pointed out that, of the many articles on the case, not one reporter thought to contact the father. Against a seamless backdrop of pro-mother outrage, the father remained literally voiceless. That was true despite the fact that the mother had plainly violated the law. As well, her claims of abuse had been investigated and found unsupported. So in fact, the judge did the only thing he could do and the only thing he should have done for the sake of the children, the father and the rule of law – order them returned to the father in Italy.
But the fact that the legal system worked properly and reached the correct result seemed not to dawn on any reporter on the case. If it did, they never let on about it.
Click to read more ...